Picture yourself in the large public square in the Capital of the Federation of White Nations. A line of 18 million people stretches out before you farther than you can see. One by one they step up onto the gallow's scaffolding.

Could you really pull the lever 18 million times and personally watch the stark reality of those people screaming and dying in agony before your very eyes? ...

Can I imagine this? Sometimes I sing myself to sleep imagining this.

---

As for paying the Palestinians to re-locate. I doubt they would do that, even for money, and if we worked something out, it would really result in paying 6 bloated capitalists billions of dollars and the average Palestinian, with whom I have honest sympathy, would end up locked in camps, behind fences.

Interesting poll, I hope others respond.

Enkidu

Can I imagine this? Sometimes I sing myself to sleep imagining this.

Perhaps you could but, as I said to Paul Drake, you will excuse me if I doubt that.

Besides that, though not strictly germane to the question posed by this poll, do you think that more than one half of the other 600 million white people alive at the time of any solution's implementation would agree with you and let you proceed? I doubt that also.

As for paying the Palestinians to re-locate. I doubt they would do that, even for money, and if we worked something out, it would really result in paying 6 bloated capitalists billions of dollars and the average Palestinian, with whom I have honest sympathy, would end up locked in camps, behind fences.

Again I must ask you to read what I have written. One part of the deal offered to the Palestinians and their neighbors was that the Palestinians be accepted and "peacefully assimilated" by the local communities which chose to co-operate. The wealth would not go to "bloated capitalists" or to corrupt governments but rather to the local communities where the Palestinians would be living. It was stated in my plan that the Federation of White Nations would monitor and ensure compliance by the receiving communities.

I believe that the Palestinians would jump at this offer.

Interesting poll, I hope others respond. Enkidu

Thank you. I also hope that others respond.

Well, we do agree on something. That's a start.

RE: Burrhus

Getting real with your scenarios; The jew would not ever permit their power to be reduced one iota without intense resistance. If it looked bad for the jew, they would think nothing of using the nuclear option to decimate the world. I think many of us underestimate the jew’s real power and influence. It’s not as if they are prominently noted on the Fortune 400 list.

There is no other global organization, save the Catholic Church that has been able to accumulate and hoard wealth for centuries as has the jew. But the difference there is that the Church uses it’s wealth for charitable ends toward all peoples, the jew’s purposes for his wealth serve only jews.

Anytime that we receive media reports where it appears that Whites have won a minor political battle against the jew’s agenda, we can be assured that it was only a hollow victory that serves the jew’s purpose.

The more that we study the jew, the more apparent that it becomes, that they must be eradicated from the face of the earth like a deadly disease. Like polio. However, it would be a dire mistake to save even one jew and place it in a government CDC-like laboratory for scientific observation. The cleansing should be total. Half-hearted measures will ultimately be fatal to us.

We should not be swayed by misguided compassion from deterring us from the logical conclusion once referred to as the “final solution“. There should be less guilt involved in exterminating the jew, then when we kill a mosquito.

This is not internet-posturing or some tough-guy talk. This is my heartfelt and logically reasoned sentiments. We are on the cusp of being snuffed-out as a race, and I use plain talk to make others understand.

We, the kind of people on this board, are immune to Jews, it is our White herds of low-grade people who get taken over by them. Should these herds exist? I think not.

So, you would kill white people too? Interesting. Pro-White? Not so much.

Consider this. Any group of people exhibits a continuum of intelligence from high to low. If you eliminate some percentage from the low end, you wind up with a new group exhibiting the same characteristc...high to low. Another culling of low-end people would produce simply another, similar new group. Repeated iterations of this operation would result in there being only the two most intelligent white people remaining.

In that event, I would find myself with only one fellow white person.

I hope that she is of child bearing age and pretty.

Hey there Hitler Goddess...ever see youself in the role of Eve as the mother of a new white race? (Humor...sort of.)

I also feel that a man who could not bear to even plan to kill out the Jews, is a weak and unmanly fellow.

Fortunately for you, you will probably never get to find out if I am "a weak and unmanly fellow". Your wife is fortunate too. You'd be surprised.

If you ever insult me again, Archer, you will be added to my No Positive Reinforcement List. I will assume for now that you regret what you said and that it will never happen again.

RE: Burrhus

Getting real with your scenarios]

Once again, I must ask you to read what I have written. Responding to a misperception of what I have said is counter-productive.

My article is not primarily about how will we strip the jews of power but rather about what we will do afterwards. The scenario that I painted discusses, early on, what events I believe will occur that will lead to the jews losing power. Please read it.

This is not internet-posturing or some tough-guy talk. This is my heartfelt and logically reasoned sentiments. We are on the cusp of being snuffed-out as a race, and I use plain talk to make others understand.

Please understand that I am not questioning the sincerity of your beliefs but rather the probablity of your really acting on them if the situation permitted. You very well might and, in the unlikely event that you had the majority of white people in agreement with you, I would be a fool to stand in your and their way. I am not a fool.

But I stand by my doubts about both you and the majority of white people. No insult intended, Brutus, just my assessment of the probablities.

I agree with you that the white race is in danger of being snuffed out. Your solution cannot be implemented as long as the jews retain the enormous power that they currently have. Discussing how we can end this jew created menace is one thing; discussing what we will do after we have is another.

Perhaps you could start a new thread where people could offer suggestions on how we will go about taking power away from the jews. I hope that this thread will continue to be about what we will do after we achieve that splendid result however it is attained.

Could you really pull the lever 18 million times and personally watch the stark reality of those people screaming and dying in agony before your very eyes? Could you really repress the enormous cumulative guilt that would build up in your conscience lever-pull after lever-pull?

No problem whatsoever. Give me the license.
And project your conscience onto someone else.

I've always had fun with the following ideas:

1. The regime of Israel has always and will continue to work against the Palestinian people and the formation of a sovereign Palestinian state.

2. Africa, through AIDS, civil wars, and genocide, is rapidly losing its native black population. If unchecked, this trend could eventually evolve Africa into an Arab super state, which could create other problems.

3. Jews are unique genetically and culturally. They need their own living space separate from everyone else so the problems we've seen in the past and see today do not occur again.

Solution:

Madagascar.

Western Nations with Jewish populations pool money together and do two things with it:

First, Buy out Madagascar from the Madagascans so the West can do with it what it pleases.

Second, Give aid money to African countries that take in Madagascans and or, create a state for native Madagascans out of an existing country in Africa.

Third, Pay Africans to patrol the waters around Madagascar, ensuring that nobody gets off the island. The UN would probably have to set up a base nearby so that air superiority missions over Madagascar can be conducted effectively.

Fourth, relocate Jews healthy enough to move to Madagascar. The ones that are infirmed or elderly and do not have family to take care of them stay where they are presently until they die of natural causes.

If these guidelines were to be implemented, think of the good that could be achieved.

Jews get their own state with no neighbors, so there is no Anti-Semitism.

African men get jobs. Africa gets more people and a booming economy in order to accommodate all of the new Madagascans.

The Palestinians get their land back and the Arab world would be a happier place, knowing that their Palestinian brothers are no longer oppressed by Jews.

The West is free of the Jews and everything they bring to Western Civilization.

Just some food for thought, specifically pie.

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ma.html#People

Since

No problem whatsoever. Give me the license.
And project your conscience onto someone else.

Cut the school-boy style, "I am a bigger jew hater than you" act. What you are saying is the easiest thing in the world to say when not faced with the situation, isn't it? And if you can't see that whites(as we are) would object to the thought of 5 year old jewish children being taken out, and that they would fight you, maybe just as harshly as the jews, I don't know what to tell you.

Amazing how the same people who claim they would not be affected by such things as their conscience, bitch and cry when some IDF soldier shoots some random Palestinian. And talk about how that shows the "evil nature"(or whatever words you may use) of the jew. Just as the Jew is the biggest hypocrite in the world when it comes to "moral outrages" so is someone like this.

Which choice corresponds to "vertical expulsion?" A phrase coined by my friend Linder.

Cut the school-boy style, "I am a bigger jew hater than you" act. What you are saying is the easiest thing in the world to say when not faced with the situation, isn't it? And if you can't see that whites(as we are) would object to the thought of 5 year old jewish children being taken out, and that they would fight you, maybe just as harshly as the jews, I don't know what to tell you.

Amazing how the same people who claim they would not be affected by such things as their conscience, bitch and cry when some IDF soldier shoots some random Palestinian. And talk about how that shows the "evil nature"(or whatever words you may use) of the jew.

You must spread some reputation around before giving it to Hitler Goddess again

It's fun and all to talk about this, but today I am wondering about more humble objectives. Like, how the hell are we going to get our message out on cable access? Excuse me if I interrupt the fantasies, for a second, and point out that we couldnt even get the Jews expelled from the local cuntry club let alone the USA.

Let's work on developing a network of people -- like our network of TAA distributors-- who are ready willing and able to run WN content like TLITS or for example these 911 things-- on a regular basis using cable access.

here is one product that is open to the public for use and broadcast:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

http://www.loosechange911.com/

It's fun and all to talk about this, but today I am wondering about more humble objectives. Like, how the hell are we going to get our message out on cable access? Excuse me if I interrupt the fantasies, for a second, and point out that we couldnt even get the Jews expelled from the local cuntry club let alone the USA.

Let's work on developing a network of people -- like our network of TAA distributors-- who are ready willing and able to run WN content like TLITS or for example these 911 things-- on a regular basis using cable access.

here is one product that is open to the public for use and broadcast:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

http://www.loosechange911.com/

Today I was thinking about TAA hawking their own bumper stickers--that's a good way to get a message out--something along the lines of "9/11: Israel knew", or others using the word neocon, alongside a star of david. Constantly associating that word with the star would be provocative without being obviously "anti-semitic".

Neither of those ideas would get your car vandalized; in these times, when Cindy Sheehan says her son died for Israel, and right and left alike are damning the neocons, I think these might be good ideas.

Frankly, I care for none of your murderous ideas. Here's my solution, which is better than any of yours, I might add. Notice the map below. In the lower right corner of the African continent is a large island called Madagascar. It has approximately 20 million seething black negroids just waiting to hump anything that looks even vaguely white. Now, Israel has almost 7 million jews, with the world total of jews just under 15 million. The most humane solution is to confine the world's jews on Madagascar, a large island completely surrounded by water and filled with the certain ingredients for long-term, gene-destroying race mixing. Jews as a subgroup of the human race, in a few generations, will be genetically polluted, since the WN government ruling over the island's overall politics will make it a crime for jews to segregate themselves in isolated communties. No, laddy, they'll have to live and work among the very groids they tried to make us live among. This, then, is the humane way to solve our jewish problem, without resorting to mass murder. Also, by containing the jews on this island, we can, if necessary, drop some low-yield "warning nukes" if the jews ever dare to attempt ANY sort of military capability - any at all. So, there you have it. We send the jews to a tropical paradise where their sub-race can gradually die out, mixed into the deep, dark nutty chocolate of nigger genes, until they are no more than a genetically fucked-up, harmless race of mongrels.

Photos of Madagascar:

"I like it, I like it! Oy vey, wadda plan! Where's my ticket!"

Killing? I'll try to keep my 2 cents worth short. I have never killed anyone, nor any animal save one rabbit on a hunting spree. Only once, a long time ago, I burned inside to go beat a man senseless with a baseball bat (I was convinced he was making unwanted advances towards my teenage daughter - several lawyers talked me out of it - I am glad they did). As to racial cleansing, a la mass murder, or mass deportation, either one is hard to swallow. Are there any historical precedents to learn from?

If it comes to that, maybe we should study what the germans did (before the outbreak of war) - I recall Hans Schimdt saying that the jews were no problem after Hitler became chancellor - some were arrested, legally, because they broke the new laws, and others behaved themselves and were left alone (by the government). Some have said there were several congregations of synagoges right in Berlin when the red army swarmed in.

The problem Germany had with jews, were apparantly NOT there own contemporary home grown german jews, but, international jews living within and outside germany that incited Britain and the US to fight their battles for them. Maybe we wouldn't have to do anything to our jews here if we had our own government, representing our own true interest, to keep watch over them.

Would we still be white folks, with all of our traditions intact, if we rounded up large numbers of law-abiding, non-combative, jews, either for deportation, or for mass killing, absent any declared war? Would the posters here be interested in finding out how the pre-war germans dealt with the problem - it could be very useful and instructional. I suspect the germans were firm but fair, and humane but harsh when dealing with willfull violators. contumacyman

Good fourth option, Professor. A tooth for a tooth, and problem solved also. A hell of a waste of a nice looking island though.

#3 is definitely out of the question. The Palestinians (and their extended brethren) wouldn't go for it, and it wouldn't work anyway. The heebs would just butter up to somebody else, China maybe, and do to us what they got us to do to Germany.

Might as well make it a choice between #1, #2 & #4. Whatever is decided, I nominate Paul Drake and Enkidu as commission co-chairmen.